Every year that I can, I attend the American Psychiatric
Association annual meeting in order to obtain CME (continuing medical
education) and connect with old friends. And pretty much every year that I’ve
attended there have been people outside the meeting protesting. Some years
there are more, some years there are less, but there always seems to be someone
outside accusing psychiatrists of being dangerous, harmful, greedy individuals.
This year, I finally got up my nerve to go speak to some of them. I wanted to
know why they were there and what their concerns were in a more detailed way
than I could work out from reading their signs. So I walked over to where one
protestor was manning a large truck showing a looping video of how awful
psychiatry is and introduced myself and asked “Why?” Why is this important to
you? What are your concerns?
He was very nice and offered to walk me over to their main
protest area, where they had literature and an exhibit set up. He let me know
he belonged to a group called the Citizens Commission for Human Rights (CCHR). On
the way over I asked him my questions about his specific concerns and why this
is important to him. He noted that he is just “the most curious guy in the
world” and claimed that once you start reading the abuses are obvious. I asked
him if he had personal experiences with psychiatry for himself or his family
members and he shrugged a little and commented that he knew a few people. He
then kindly pointed me in the right direction and said goodbye.
I walked over to where the CCHR had their exhibit set up in
Yerba Buena Gardens, across the street from the convention center where the
meeting was being held. They had a long narrow white tent, the type you might
see at an outdoor reception, and they had arranged a walk through exhibit that
presented their argument that psychiatry is harmful. I walked through and read
their displays and watched some of their videos, and I found several major
problems with the statements that were being presented. The first problem is that
many of the displays talked about events in the 1800’s, in Nazi Germany, and in
the Soviet Union. I am not arguing that terrible things were done by
psychiatrists (and many other people, including other medical doctors) in the
past. But those events do not represent psychiatry as it is practiced today nor
does it represent the psychiatrists who practice it. I’m not saying there
aren’t bad or unethical psychiatrists, but as a group and a profession we
repudiate past abusers and strive for high ethical and humanistic standards in
caring for our patients.
The second problem was the persistent statement that
psychiatry has no scientific basis. That statement is just wrong. There are
hundreds of research papers documenting changes in the brain that occur with
multiple psychiatric illnesses. There are hundreds more that document specific
genetic abnormalities linked to different illnesses. There are even papers
showing reversal of brain changes with treatment of depression. Is the science
of psychiatry where it needs to be? No, absolutely not. It would be fantastic
to have a blood or imaging test that could tell us in a simple, clear and
specific fashion if someone had a mental illness, what illness they had and
what treatment would be optimal. We don’t have any such testing yet, which is
incredibly frustrating to psychiatrists as well as our patients. But it also
isn’t surprising because the brain is the most complex organ in the human body.
It has 100 billion neurons that connect to each other in over 100 trillion
synapses. No offense to my cardiology or pulmonology colleagues, but the brain
is just a lot more complicated than a heart or a lung. And we haven’t had the
tools to study that complexity for very long. So the science of psychiatry is
new, and growing, but it is absolutely there and psychiatrists are working hard
to improve it. At my own hospital we are taking part in a study to see if EEG’s
can give us guidance as to whether (and which) medication might be helpful for
an individual. The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, of which version 5
was just released) is not a perfect tool, and people are already talking about
revisions for DSM-6. I would suggest, however, that our imperfect diagnostic and treatment systems are better than no care at all.
The third major problem I found was the repeated accusation
that psychiatrists were greedy and power hungry. Quotes were taken out of
context and plastered on billboards to convey the idea that psychiatrists want
to infiltrate education and government and mind control the entire population.
Other statements were made that psychiatrists make up illnesses and drug people
to keep themselves in business. I am sure some psychiatrists have made extreme
statements and that some psychiatrists are greedy. After all, we are a group of
human beings and that means that we will have a range of intentions and goals.
However no one goes into medicine to get rich (try business instead if wealth
is your goal) and psychiatrists are on the low end of the physician pay scale. We
do our work for other reasons than money. Do you know the best attended, most
crowded sessions I found at the APA this year? Sessions on mindfulness and
sessions on cognitive behavioral therapy were so tightly packed people were standing
in the back. Neither of these sessions were about topics that are going to make
anyone any money. They were about topics with profound potential to reach out
and touch our patients and improve their lives.
The last major problem was the implication that
psychiatrists go out looking for patients and harm them. I can’t speak for all
psychiatrists, of course, but I’ve never gone out looking for patients in my
life. People come to me, asking for help. It often feels like a flood of people
beating down my door. People tell me they are suffering and I try to work with
them to figure out what to do about that. I can’t speak for all psychiatrists,
but I was taught and I continue to practice a collaborative model of
psychiatric care. I attempt to think with my patients about what is going on in
their brains and in their lives. I talk about a range of various interventions
we could try and I speak honestly about the risks and potential benefits of
medication, therapy, or even doing nothing. I’ve had many, many patients tell
me I’ve helped them. I’ve even had a few where I think I saved their lives.
I’ve had patients return months or years later to let me know they are doing
well now and to thank me again for my help. Obviously that’s just my personal
perspective and experience, but it just doesn’t match with the material the
CCHR was presenting on the damage they feel my profession is causing.
At the end of the exhibit I talked to another protestor. She
was also very pleasant and courteous, even after I told her I was a psychiatrist.
She shared her concerns that doctors use their authority to coerce people into
treatment. She also mentioned that she hasn’t had a personal experience with
psychiatry, but that her beliefs grew out of her religion of Scientology. She
informed me that the Citizens Commission for Human Rights is Scientology group.
She was open to hearing from me that one of the reasons I went into psychiatry
is that a dear, much loved family member had ECT treatment after years of
depression and suicide attempts and that it worked incredibly, amazingly well.
We smiled and shook hands and I left, fairly certain I had not convinced her of
anything but hoping I had given her something to think about.
Here’s what I wish CCHR understood. Being a psychiatrist is
one of the hardest medical professions. Our science is new and underdeveloped.
We struggle against the ongoing fear our culture has of mental illness and the mentally
ill, and that stigma reaches out to brush us as professionals. Working as a
psychiatrist can be painful and exhausting as we work with patients who have
been deeply traumatized by either their biology or their environment or both. And
we keep doing this work because we care. Most psychiatrists go into mental
health because of a deep wish to connect with and heal others. Ours is the most
philosophical branch of medicine, the branch that deals directly with the human
experience in this world. Psychiatry touches on ethics, religion, science, art,
sociology and medicine. As psychiatrists, we tap into the length and breadth of
our lives to reach out a build a bridge to our patients, to help them walk back
across the abyss into health. We do a difficult and necessary job, and we strive to do it well.